Posted on Leave a comment

ConCourt Declares UNISA Language Policy Unconstitutional after 5 Year Long Court Case!

ConCourt Declares UNISA Language Policy Unconstitutional in 5 Year Long Court Case!

It is tragic that the courts have to protect the true diversity of South Africa, with a dozen languages, from the ANC regime, and it remains unfortunate that the ANC government preaches diversity, yet applies monolingualism. This ruling is appropriate on the eve of Heritage Day, in that it recognized the language rights of students, and imposes a specific obligation with regard to execution on Unisa. It is equally unfortunate that language and cultural communities have to turn to the courts in the final instance, to claim their rights as diverse languages with specific reference to Afrikaans, especially at historically Afrikaans universities.

The Afrikanerbond yesterday issued a statement noting with satisfaction the ruling by the Constitutional Court, that UNISA’s language policy is unconstitutional and unlawful. They took the opportunity to congratulate AfriForum on instituting proceedings against Unisa, and on their perseverance over the course of five years to have the matter settled.

 

S 29(2), on which the judgement rests, determines that everyone has the right to receive education in the official language of their choice in public educational institutions, which, according to the ruling, also includes higher education institutions. To ensure this right, the state can consider all reasonable educational alternatives, including single-medium institutions, as long as such institutions meet the requirements of equality and reasonable practicability, and address past discriminatory laws and practices. Furthermore, everyone has the right to set up private educational institutions as long as these institutions are not racially discriminatory, are registered with the state and maintain the same standards as public institutions. The state may subsidise such private institutions.

 

The Constitution contains certain language arrangements that have so far not been properly observed or, as the ruling against Unisa reflects, are unconstitutional and unlawful. The trend so far has been to change a multilingual South Africa into an English-monolingual South Africa. It is not about a struggle between languages, but about the preservation and expansion of languages, including Afrikaans and the other indigenous languages. Therefore, it remains continuously necessary to negotiate a binding commitment to the equal treatment of all 10 indigenous languages in official use. English should never be the only privileged language. We hope and trust that other universities and institutions have taken careful note of the ruling!

 

Listen and Read also: Afrikaans was 146 Years Old on 14 August, Ironically also the Last Day for Comments on Second Draft of Stellenbosch University’s Language Policy


 

Posted on Leave a comment

South Africans don’t fall for Ramaphosa’s Act – 82% say Corruption is Same or Worse Under Cyril!

South Africans don't fall for Ramaphosa's Act - 82% say Corruption is Same or Worse Under Cyril!

Two-thirds of South Africans believe that corruption has increased in the past year, and half (49%) believe that it has “increased a lot.” Furthermore, a survey shows that people not only think that corruption has gotten worse under Ramaphosa, but also recognize that a large part of the elected officials and civil servants, who should be fighting corruption, are involved in corrupt activities themselves.
Continue reading South Africans don’t fall for Ramaphosa’s Act – 82% say Corruption is Same or Worse Under Cyril!

Posted on Leave a comment

EFF Leader, Julius Malema, Convicted of Violating Parliament’s Code of Ethics on Two Charges!

EFF Leader, Malema, Convicted of Violating Parliament's Code of Ethics on Two Charges!

The Joint Committee on Ethics found that Malema had violated the code of ethics for members of parliament by not enforcing the law, when he called on foreign nationals to find ‘creative ways‘ to invade SA illegally, after SA borders were closed during the Covid lockdown in January.
Continue reading EFF Leader, Julius Malema, Convicted of Violating Parliament’s Code of Ethics on Two Charges!

Posted on Leave a comment

African Union Playing Vaccine Victim Again Despite “Rich Countries” Having EIGHT Times More Covid Deaths per Million Population!

African Union Playing Vaccine Victim Again Despite "Rich Countries" Having EIGHT Times More Covid Deaths per Million Population!

The European Union’s African Union has declared that “rich countries” should stop storing Covid vaccines, to use for future boosters, which do not yet appear to be necessary, but should rather give them to Africa. Of course, AU is once again playing the begging bowl race card, that Africa is the eternal victim, in order to get things for free again, however the truth is that Africa has come off pretty light from the whole pandemic, despite all the mainstream fear-mongering and propaganda. The truth is that Africa has only a fraction of the Covid deaths that Europe and USA have.
Continue reading African Union Playing Vaccine Victim Again Despite “Rich Countries” Having EIGHT Times More Covid Deaths per Million Population!

Posted on Leave a comment

Landmark Case to Show How Twitter, California & Democrat Party Colluded to use “Election Integrity” as a Weapon to Censor Conservatives!

Landmark Case to Show How Twitter, California & Democrat Party Colluded to use "Election Integrity" as a Weapon to Censor Conservatives!

An important landmark lawsuit that might very well prove the fact that Twitter is indeed a state actor, which could have some very serious implications, has been brought by Harmy Dillon and Ron Coleman in California, with all the evidence and receipts, to show that Twitter and the State of California conspired with the Democratic Party, to get Twitter to censor the people they don’t like politically, using “Election Integrity” as a false default reason.

According to Robert Barnes of Barnes Law, speaking on Viva Barnes, the plaintiffs have document after document after document proving it, but as we have seen in recent years, facts and evidence are no longer considered proof in a world where the Mainstream Media and Big Tech manufacture the reality.

The plaintiff, who is a lawyer from California, had a pretty big social media presence, and was completely censored and cancelled, simply for raising basic questions about what happened in the election, that were not even violations of Twitter’s supposed rules at the time. The State of California created a special committee which gave private contracts to big Democratic consultants, to flag Twitter posts they didn’t like, and falsely allege it affected “election integrity.”

They then went to Twitter and set up a special relationship with Twitter, where Twitter would do whatever these Democrat consultants demanded. Yet these consultants were working at the behest and on behalf of the State of California.

It is a landmark case because they are bringing in the “pruniar doctrine” and trying to enforce it, in this case, to test the prunair doctrine, which states that even private companies are subject to the First Amendment, if they have a de-facto monopoly on public discourse, and clearly Twitter does in this space.

They have even better additional evidence that Twitter was acting as an agent of the State of California, because they have the email chain and the text records. They used variations of the Sunshine Laws in California, which is the equivalent of the Freedom of Information act. They got incriminating evidence and admissions that showed the degree to which Twitter was just doing whatever the state of California, through their Democrat political consultants, demanded. These consultants were retained, effectively in a no-bid contract, by the Attorney General, who gave him a sweetheart deal. and is now a United States Senator from California.

It exposes extraordinary corruption and collusion between Big Tech and the State and a sitting United States Senator, to censor speech they didn’t like concerning the election, to protect and hide whatever bad acts they committed during the Presidential Election.

This case proves to everyone who trusts Mainstream Media and Big Tech, and who have been saying there’s no collusion between Big Tech and the government. It is now undeniable and it’s indisputable, so the only question is will there be a legal loophole that would allow the defendants to weasel out, on “standing” or with whatever immunity they can conjure up. We know as a matter of fact that there is active coordination between Big Tech and the State, and we have seen it now between Zuckerberg and Fauci, with the news that “could not be
spoken.”

In a year’s time it is elections in USA again and we’re seeing the same pattern with the election fortification discussion, which we are now seeing in real time and anybody clinging to this idea, with desperation, to say that there’s no collusion between big tech and government is willfully blind or dishonest or on the payroll.

 

Watch also: VIDEO: The Smoking Gun US Election Fraud Evidence That News24, SABC, IOL, etc. Hide From You! Institutional Election Rigging Systemic Across USA!