An important landmark lawsuit that might very well prove the fact that Twitter is indeed a state actor, which could have some very serious implications, has been brought by Harmy Dillon and Ron Coleman in California, with all the evidence and receipts, to show that Twitter and the State of California conspired with the Democratic Party, to get Twitter to censor the people they don’t like politically, using “Election Integrity” as a false default reason.
According to Robert Barnes of Barnes Law, speaking on Viva Barnes, the plaintiffs have document after document after document proving it, but as we have seen in recent years, facts and evidence are no longer considered proof in a world where the Mainstream Media and Big Tech manufacture the reality.
The plaintiff, who is a lawyer from California, had a pretty big social media presence, and was completely censored and cancelled, simply for raising basic questions about what happened in the election, that were not even violations of Twitter’s supposed rules at the time. The State of California created a special committee which gave private contracts to big Democratic consultants, to flag Twitter posts they didn’t like, and falsely allege it affected “election integrity.”
They then went to Twitter and set up a special relationship with Twitter, where Twitter would do whatever these Democrat consultants demanded. Yet these consultants were working at the behest and on behalf of the State of California.
It is a landmark case because they are bringing in the “pruniar doctrine” and trying to enforce it, in this case, to test the prunair doctrine, which states that even private companies are subject to the First Amendment, if they have a de-facto monopoly on public discourse, and clearly Twitter does in this space.
They have even better additional evidence that Twitter was acting as an agent of the State of California, because they have the email chain and the text records. They used variations of the Sunshine Laws in California, which is the equivalent of the Freedom of Information act. They got incriminating evidence and admissions that showed the degree to which Twitter was just doing whatever the state of California, through their Democrat political consultants, demanded. These consultants were retained, effectively in a no-bid contract, by the Attorney General, who gave him a sweetheart deal. and is now a United States Senator from California.
It exposes extraordinary corruption and collusion between Big Tech and the State and a sitting United States Senator, to censor speech they didn’t like concerning the election, to protect and hide whatever bad acts they committed during the Presidential Election.
This case proves to everyone who trusts Mainstream Media and Big Tech, and who have been saying there’s no collusion between Big Tech and the government. It is now undeniable and it’s indisputable, so the only question is will there be a legal loophole that would allow the defendants to weasel out, on “standing” or with whatever immunity they can conjure up. We know as a matter of fact that there is active coordination between Big Tech and the State, and we have seen it now between Zuckerberg and Fauci, with the news that “could not be
spoken.”
In a year’s time it is elections in USA again and we’re seeing the same pattern with the election fortification discussion, which we are now seeing in real time and anybody clinging to this idea, with desperation, to say that there’s no collusion between big tech and government is willfully blind or dishonest or on the payroll.
Watch also: VIDEO: The Smoking Gun US Election Fraud Evidence That News24, SABC, IOL, etc. Hide From You! Institutional Election Rigging Systemic Across USA!
.gif)
